ആദ്യത്തെ 200 വരികൾ.
The Mona Lisa...
Bewitching...
Seductive...
World-famous.
In the minds of millions, she is the ultimate work of art -
endlessly photographed and admired.
Yet, behind the enigmatic smile,
she remains a mystery.
Who was she?
Why was she painted?
And what has made her the world's most famous painting?
After 500 years in the spotlight
the Mona Lisa is finally giving up her secrets.
Centuries-old documents are at last revealing long-forgotten truths.
This is wonderful. Ooh! I've got a shiver down my spine.
State-of-the-art technology is taking us
beneath the painted surface
to decode astonishing new evidence.
That's extraordinary - wow!
That's quite a big discovery, isn't it?
Yes, it is.
This investigation -
the first full forensic examination
of the latest discoveries -
takes me round the world in the hunt
for the truth about Leonardo da Vinci's masterpiece.
With exclusive access and some extraordinary encounters...
The first impression when I came in was...
I did well not to jump backwards in shock!
These revelations will change everything we thought we knew
about history's most enigmatic work of art...
That's great. So we just made a new discovery.
And unlock the secrets of the Mona Lisa.
All of this together marks an extraordinary moment
in the history of art, but more than that,
this is quite simply one of the stories of the century.
500 years ago a man painted a woman.
The man was Leonardo da Vinci -
artist, inventor, genius -
and the result of his work
was the inscrutable portrait we now know as the Mona Lisa.
It's a masterpiece.
But one of the few works he actually finished.
So what draws us to the Mona Lisa?
She's not a famous monarch or a legendary historical figure.
We know hardly anything about her.
So what is it about this picture that's gripped the human imagination
for so many centuries?
I want to begin my investigation
by comparing notes with a detective
who's been on the case for more than 30 years.
One of the world's leading experts on Leonardo da Vinci,
Oxford professor Martin Kemp has spent much of his life
obsessed by the mystery of the Mona Lisa.
What do you think is the key to the Mona Lisa's extraordinary
stature as without doubt
the world's most famous painting?
Well, there has to be something inherent in the picture.
Some things are famous for being famous.
We live in an age of celebrity
and lots of celebrities are famous for being famous,
but they're not going to last.
This has gone on for ages.
It is just extraordinary.
And you've got this sense
of something which is beyond pigment
and beyond a good likeness and being beyond a face,
and it just has that totally uncanny living presence.
It was very daring at the time
for a woman in a portrait to look at you.
You know, women's portraits simply didn't do that,
and I think the ambiguity, the... the tease - the visual tease -
is something that Leonardo absolutely cultivated.
Look at the Mona Lisa
and you can't help feeling there's more going on than meets the eye.
If her teasing smile's a question mark,
the painting's a riddle.
What makes a human being live and breathe?
What forces govern the world we live in?
Leonardo thought about these questions as deeply as anyone.
And behind this breathtakingly lifelike image,
lay years of investigation into spheres of knowledge
Iike geology and anatomy, some of which
were forbidden by the church.
Tantalising evidence for the research that went into the Mona Lisa
Iies hidden in Windsor Castle.
Amongst the gems of the Royal Collection
is an intriguing clue to the genesis of the portrait.
A page from what might be called the real da Vinci Code.
If you want to see, or have some sense of,
just how much work there was behind the surface of the picture
then this is a great place to start.
It's a sheet of drawings by Leonardo's own hand.
And what does it contain in faint outline?
Look here...
It's a bit like the Cheshire Cat,
it's the Mona Lisa's smile
without the Mona Lisa attached.
It may well have been Leonardo's first gropings towards his idea
for the painting.
It's a series of studies of the human mouth,
the motions of the mouth.
How the mouth puckers.
How the mouth...bares its teeth.
You have a very strong sense that for Leonardo
every picture is a kind of encyclopaedia entry
and this is just that part of it
dealing with the mouth.
It's just the tip of the iceberg.
The Mona Lisa is the work into which Leonardo poured everything he knew
about humanity and the world that surrounds us
with its ceaseless play of light and shade.
But there's a mystery there, too.
And it's staring us in the face.
Who is the woman with the enigmatic smile?
It's a question that has fuelled all kinds of speculation
ranging from the ingenious to the crackpot.
She's a pregnant mother-to-be.
She's a prostitute.
She's even a man in drag.
But if you look beyond the theories
there are clues to her true identity.
Florence, 1500.
After many years away
Leonardo da Vinci has returned
to the city of his youth.
He's come back to work on ambitious military projects
for powerful men.
He says he's too busy to paint portraits of wealthy aristocrats
who clamour after him.
Yet according to one writer
Leonardo somehow finds time to paint the portrait, not of a noblewoman,
but of a humble merchant's wife called Lisa.
It was here that Leonardo da Vinci
began the most famous painting
in the world...
And it was here that Giorgio Vasari -
the inventor of the very idea of the Renaissance,
the author of the very first book about the Renaissance -
produced Exhibit A in the case of the Mona Lisa.
The very first account of the painting.
Who was she?
She was the wife of Francesco del Giocondo, a rich merchant.
He commissioned Leonardo to create her portrait,
and Leonardo responded with a picture, says Vasari,
"So miraculously lifelike
"that it seems to be made of flesh, not paint."
"Leonardo," he says, "wanted to avoid the melancholy
"that dominates so many other portraits
"so he employed musicians, entertainers, buffoons
"to keep her amused."
So there you have it -
the wife of Francesco del Giocondo,
and the smile caused by
entertainers hired by the artist.
An open-and-shut case.
Or is it?
How can we be sure that Vasari was right,
and that Leonardo did indeed paint Lisa del Giocondo?
After all, Vasari wrote his account 30 years after Leonardo's death,
and although he did his homework here in Florence,
he never disclosed his sources.
So could it just be hearsay?
Some inaccurate local legend?
For centuries there was no way of telling.
Then suddenly new evidence emerged
from a completely unexpected source.
In 2006, a research scholar
working in the University Library of Heidelberg
turned up this.
What it is, is a page from a copy of Cicero,
the ancient Roman author,
a book that was once owned
here in Florence by a man called Agostino Vespucci.
And not only does it have Cicero's text,
but it's got Vespucci's commentaries
and this particular passage is crucial.
Because in it Cicero is discussing Apelles,
the ancient Greek artist,
and his remarks prompt Vespucci to make his own notes -
his marginal note -
and what he writes is a kind of bombshell
in the history of Leonardo studies.
He says "Apelles, ha!
"He did just the same thing as Leonardo
"in his portrait of Lisa del Giocondo."
And best of all, there's a date -
"October, 1503."
So this was written almost immediately after Vespucci
must have seen the portrait of Lisa del Giocondo
in Leonardo da Vinci's workshop.
This is gold dust, and it proves
that Vasari was definitely right in at least one sense all along.
Leonardo definitely did paint a portrait of Lisa del Giocondo.
There you have it.
Independent testimony from a man in Florence in 1503
who probably saw the picture still wet on the artist's easel.
But now there's another question.
Why did Leonardo paint Lisa
when the great and powerful couldn't coax a picture from him?
No comments yet. Be the first to leave one.